W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4]

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 01:00:20 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020206005912.03a10430@joy.songbird.com>
To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Agree.  This how I'd expect CC/PP to deal with the issue.  (Speaking for 
myself, etc.)

#g
--

At 12:05 PM 2/5/02 -0500, Daniel W. Connolly wrote:
>On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote:
>
> > At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > >Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts
> > >of properties.
> >
> > That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly.
>
>There's some lack of clarity somewhere; folks seem to be arguing:
>
>         if communities need to use both datatyping idioms,
>         they need double properties.
>
>         PRISM needs datatyping
>         => therefore
>         PRISM needs double properties
>
>which isn't a sound inference; it needs another premise:
>
>         PRISM needs to use both datatyping idioms.
>
>I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps)
>will do just fine only using S-B.
>
>So I don't think the statement of the issue is sufficiently clear.
>
>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>(writing from python10)

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 20:08:50 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:05 EDT