W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)]

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:48:26 +0200
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B897B3CA.EE88%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-02-18 23:41, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote:


> (a) enough RDF/XML examples to get going in monkey-see-monkey-do fashion

Did either of the following sets of use cases help to address this?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0469.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0478.html

> (b) S-B, i.e. a way to use rdfs:range to restrict the range
> of a property to the lexical space of some datatype.

Does the union interpretation of rdfs:drange, which treats
the inline (S-B) and value triple idioms as synonymous, and
the addition of the lexical range specific rdfs:lrange property
address this?

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 00:46:56 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:16 EDT