W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

RE: summary of reification?

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 13:43:32 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020207134230.028234f0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: "Sergey Melnik" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 13:32 07/02/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Brian
>
>may I suggest a process for the reification discussion.

You may, to Frank as the issue owner.  I agree that it is critical to get a 
consistent set of decisions.

Brian

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 08:48:57 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Eric Miller: "RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4]"
Previous message: Brian McBride: "RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4]"
In reply to: Jeremy Carroll: "RE: summary of reification?"
Next in thread: Jeremy Carroll: "RE: summary of reification?"
Reply: Jeremy Carroll: "RE: summary of reification?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:07 EDT