Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable)

At 11:53 08/02/2002 +0000, patrick.stickler@nokia.com wrote:
[...]

>>Sergey suggests that the range of <age> can be the UNION of xsdr:integer.
>>map and xsdr:integer.lex and xsdr:integer.val.
>
>Well, actually I suggested it...  ;-)

Oh dear, that's twice this week I've done that.  I'm clearly losing the 
plot.  My appologies.


>but I'm very glad Sergey and I now seem to "connect" on
>this understanding.

If that means agree, then so am I.


>>Patrick: are you satisfied?
>
>Maybe. If that means that a datatype URI denotes the whole
>datatype and nothing but the datatype
>  so help us RDF, and
>the *.(map|val|lex) distinctions live only in the MT,
>then yes.

To keep my life bearable, I need unconditional yes/no answers to such 
questions, please.

Brian