W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: reification test case

From: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 13:26:02 +0100
Message-ID: <3C5E7DDA.520D7BAA@profium.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, brian_mcbride@hp.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote:
> 
> Let me recast this then:
> 
> We have to decide on Dan Brickley's equality test.  Does
> 
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:type>      <rdf:Statement> .
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:subject>   <subject> .
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:object>    <object> .
> >
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:type>      <rdf:Statement> .
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:subject>   <subject> .
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:object>    <object> .
> >
> >  <stmt1> <property>      <foo> .
> >
> >  entail:
> >
> >  <stmt2> <property>      <foo> .
> 
> Brian


No, surely not. Patrick's original argument (using <property> =
`source') seems to apply still.

These two reified statements may have different provenance...

-- 
Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
Profium, Les Espaces de Sophia,
Immeuble Delta, B.P. 037, F-06901 Sophia-Antipolis, France
Tel. +33 (0)4.93.95.31.44 Fax. +33 (0)4.93.95.52.58
Mob. +33 (0)6.21.01.54.56 Internet: http://www.profium.com
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 07:26:09 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:03 EDT