W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Datatyping Summary V5 (skippable)

From: <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:53:40 +0000
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
To: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-Id: <7E8477FD-1C8A-11D6-BA50-0003931DF47C@nokia.com>

On Friday, February 8, 2002, at 10:53 , ext Brian McBride wrote:

> Issue B1:
> =========
>
> status: proposed resolution
>
> In S, if one wants to use both idiom A and idiom B, e.g.
>
> <mary> <age> "10" .
> <age> <rdfs:range> <xsd:integer.lex> .
>
> and
>
> <mary> <ageD> _:a .
> _:a <xsd:integer.map> "10" .
>
> two properties have to be used, <age> and <ageD>, in this example.
>
> Sergey suggests that the range of <age> can be the UNION of xsdr:integer.
> map and xsdr:integer.lex and xsdr:integer.val.

Well, actually I suggested it...  ;-)

but I'm very glad Sergey and I now seem to "connect" on
this understanding.

> Patrick: are you satisfied?
>

Maybe. If that means that a datatype URI denotes the whole
datatype and nothing but the datatype so help us RDF, and
the *.(map|val|lex) distinctions live only in the MT,
then yes.

But then, that's what I've been saying all along ;-)

Cheers,

Patrick
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 06:52:23 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:08 EDT