Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15)

On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 20:36, Aaron Swartz wrote:
[...]
> DanC recently vehemently defended this requirement:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0028
> 
> So OWL _must_ use URIs, and thus are safe from this change.

See the thread that follows.
I used URI in the sense that it was originally
coined and is usually used: including
a fragment identifier. This was clarified later
in the thread.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 23:22:24 UTC