W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 14 Feb 2002 22:22:49 -0600
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1013746970.19333.29.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 20:36, Aaron Swartz wrote:
[...]
> DanC recently vehemently defended this requirement:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Feb/0028
> 
> So OWL _must_ use URIs, and thus are safe from this change.

See the thread that follows.
I used URI in the sense that it was originally
coined and is usually used: including
a fragment identifier. This was clarified later
in the thread.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 23:22:24 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:12 EDT