- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 20:20:21 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 06:56 PM 2/6/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >To my simple mind it boils down to a choice. Does a reified statement >represent a statement or a stating (an occurrence of a statement in a graph). > >The formal model part of M&S is clear that its a statement. Just for the record, I disagree that M&S is clear about this. >Please lets stay out of the rat holes, choose and move on. So yes, let's choose -- I feel no M&S precedent for either option. I think you said the right question before: >We have to decide on Dan Brickley's equality test. Does > >> <stmt1> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . >> <stmt1> <rdf:subject> <subject> . >> <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . >> <stmt1> <rdf:object> <object> . >> >> <stmt2> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . >> <stmt2> <rdf:subject> <subject> . >> <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . >> <stmt2> <rdf:object> <object> . >> >> <stmt1> <property> <foo> . >> >> entail: >> >> <stmt2> <property> <foo> . And I think the answer is "no". #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 15:30:10 UTC