>I think it's probably appropriate to ask if people think we've done >enough or, at least, what else they think ought to be done to "declare >victory". My own view (expressed in my message to Sergey) is that we >can't just "wash our hands"; too much has been made of "RDF >reification" in the past. That means we probably need to be more >explicit about what our "revised position" is about reification, e.g., >for guidance of any editor that needs to write about it. (In other >words, here's an invitation for anyone who wants to "declare victory" to >write the "victory declaration statement".) I think we have done enough. It doesn't amount to much as part of a formal definition of a language, but a big step for mankind by getting the issues clear. I think Brian is eminently qualified to write the victory statement, but I could have a shot at it. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 15:05:30 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:17 EDT