W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: reification test case

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:24:39 +0100
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "brian_mcbride" <brian_mcbride@hp.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFDFB5C62E.73D936F5-ONC1256B56.0052C9DB@agfa.be>


> Let me recast this then:
>
> We have to decide on Dan Brickley's equality test.  Does
>
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:type>      <rdf:Statement> .
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:subject>   <subject> .
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
> >  <stmt1> <rdf:object>    <object> .
> >
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:type>      <rdf:Statement> .
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:subject>   <subject> .
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
> >  <stmt2> <rdf:object>    <object> .
> >
> >  <stmt1> <property>      <foo> .
> >
> >  entail:
> >
> >  <stmt2> <property>      <foo> .

it of course all depends on the theory of RDF reification
if we want to go the way that a statement is a functional
property of a triple, then the answer to your question is YES

--
Jos
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:25:22 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:03 EDT