W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)]

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:32:23 +0000 (GMT)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0202191431340.15622-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote:

> At 10:25 19/02/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:
> [...]
>
> > >    o Are there features that could be dropped and
> > >      still meet the needs of your users? (Which?)
> >
> >Of the datatyping options presented, I prefer the doublet approach, for
> >what it's worth.
>
> Does that mean:
>
>    1 you could drop the datatype triple
>    2 you could drop either the doublet or the datatype tripple
>      and would prefer to drop the triple
>    3 none of the above (please clarify)


3.

> > >    o Does the proposal 'work for you'?
> >
> >As clean as the resulting MT may be, I still find this construction
> >ugly.
>
> This construction?

The blank-node style of constructions, in general.


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
I am now available for general use under a modified BSD licence.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 09:33:15 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:16 EDT