W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:57:38 +0100
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF82044AA0.5ABD5E18-ONC1256B5C.005DDBDE@agfa.be>


>>and Statement is according to a "yes" on DanBri's entailment test case
>A simple way to interpret the vote at Friday's telecon is that we decide
>that an rdf:Statement represents a stating (an occurence of a
>statement).  Would that then imply that the entailment does not follow;
>i.e. that two resources with the same values for their subject, predicate
>and object properties may denote different statings.

yes, but then
the subject of "Mary hit the-ball"
should be a word starting with "M"
and *not* my wife

clarify versus fix?

Received on Sunday, 10 February 2002 13:00:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:55 UTC