W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Reification puzzles (was: RE: reification test case)

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:46:14 -0000
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000a01c1ae32$579b06e0$887ba8c0@mitchum>

> From: Pat Hayes [mailto:phayes@ai.uwf.edu] 
> For example, does a graph containing a triple entail the same graph 
> with a reification of the triple added to it? I can see why it ought 
> to: after all, if you look at the reification, it has a blank node in 
> it, and so what it asserts seems to be that something exists with 
> these properties. Well, of *course* something exists with those 
> properties: there it is, in the graph we started with, it's a 
> triple....

Not in the example we're being asked to decide on. Does a graph
containing a reification entail a triple?

Bill de hÓra
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 05:50:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:55 UTC