> > We could allow arbitrary typed values as node labels. e.g. in the B10 > > example the nodes are labelled with the number 10.5 and not > with the string > > "10.5" nor the string "10,5". > > Unfortunately, Jeremy, such an approach cannot work in practice. > > Otherwise all RDF parsers must support all arbitrary datatypes > and the RDF graph must provide a *lexical* representation > (albeit canonical) for all values of all arbitrary datatypes?... > I was (perhaps not explicitly) expecting that the action for unknown datatypes would be to use the TDL pair (datatype uri + lexical string) as the (representation of the) value. JeremyReceived on Monday, 4 February 2002 11:23:58 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:03 EDT