W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: URIs vs. URIviews (was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-02-15)

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:02:27 -0600
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B892E193.20DD6%me@aaronsw.com>
On 2002-02-15 3:53 PM, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote:

>> a) In the REST architectural model (which the TAG seems to be agreeing
>> about) fragment identifiers only make sense within the context of an HTTP
>> response (a bag of bits). They identify parts of a document, not general
>> Resources like full URIs.
> 
> Wait a minute. Are you saying that every 'genuine' resource must be
> an document?? And that part of a document cannot be a resource???
> That is an impossibly narrow view of 'resource'.

I'm saying the opposite. It seems you're not understanding me at all. Not
sure what else to do.

-- 
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 17:02:28 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:14 EDT