W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: to pull or not to pull [was: Re: Entailment and bags (was:Re: Agenda items for the f2f)]

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:55:13 +0200
To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B891AA81.E699%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-02-14 17:20, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:


> It seems clear to me.  Experiemental explanatory text:
> 
> [[
> 
> A resource of type rdf:Alt is an ordered collection.  A collection may be
> given the type rdf:Alt, as opposed to rdf:Bag or rdf:Seq, as a hint to the
> reader that typical processing by an application will be to select one
> member of the collection for processing.  For example, a schema designer
> might use rdf:Alt to represent the collection of mirror sites from which a
> file may be downloaded.  In all respects, other than this hint, a resource
> of type rdf:Alt is just like an rdf:Seq.
> 
> ]]

Sounds good to me.

Patrick 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 10:53:49 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:11 EDT