W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: type/dtype/subclassing and range/subproperties

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:13:50 -0600
Message-Id: <p0510147cb88d9d635fb6@[]>
To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>  We may in fact need something like rdfs:drange ("deranged"? ;-)
>>  if rdfs:range only implies rdf:type and not rdf:dtype,
>we have that per
>{ ?d a rdf:DataType . ?p rdfs:range ?d . ?s ?p ?o } log:implies { ?o 
>rdf:dType ?d } .

Right, but that is a dtype in the conclusion, right? the rdf:type 
follows by normal rdfs inference, but the range-datatyping is 
something else that requires an extra semantic constraint. I don't 
think we need deranged unless we want to allow some ranges to 'do' 
datatyping and others not. And that can be handled, if someone wants 
to do it, by defining a coextensive class with the datatype and 
making that be the range. Then you get rdf:type inheritance (with one 
extra inference step) but the datatyping is blocked, so no rdf:dtype.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 11:13:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:55 UTC