Re: Parser mods to support rdf:dtype and rdf:lform

>>>Patrick Stickler said:
> On 2002-02-15 12:52, "ext Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Those bits of syntax generate different ntriples and if you want the
> > latter to be the same as the former, parser changes will be needed.
> 
> No. They *should* generate different triples, since they are
> different idioms. Their equivalence is logical, not syntactic.

You chopped out the bits of syntax I was refering to, so I have
really no idea what you want now?  Do you want rdf:dtype to generate
statements a URI value, when used as an attribute?  Is there
something to do with rdf:lvalue that I'm missing?  etc.

Dave

Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 06:40:05 UTC