At 12:27 PM 2/20/02 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote: >Well, I half-agree, but we can't have all three things at once: > >1. You and Graham want range-sensitive inline literals. >2. Dan C. wants an inline literal used with no datatyping to unambiguously >denote a character string. >3. We all want the logic to be monotonic. > >Something has to give. Didn't the S proposal achieve all that? #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 18:16:57 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:18 EDT