Re: simplified datatyping proposal

At 12:27 PM 2/20/02 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote:
>Well, I half-agree, but we can't have all three things at once:
>
>1. You and Graham want range-sensitive inline literals.
>2. Dan C. wants an inline literal used with no datatyping to unambiguously 
>denote a character string.
>3. We all want the logic to be monotonic.
>
>Something has to give.

Didn't the S proposal achieve all that?

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 18:16:57 UTC