W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: simplified datatyping proposal

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:24:20 +0100
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Cc: "\"\"Pat Hayes <\"phayes\" <phayes\"_<phayes\" phayes\"@ai.uwf.edu>, \"\"Graham Klyne <\"Graham.Klyne\" <Graham.Klyne\"_"<Graham.Klyne" Graham.Klyne"@MIMEsweeper.com>, ""w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFDFB19237.A754E2F5-ONC1256B68.00014BBF@agfa.be>

Oops... forgot to mention that that check is
like a DDT (datatype triple) (as you may have seen)
bridging S-B assertions to DTT queries




[...]

>>  ... i.e. under some schema, say:
>>
>>    ex:age rdfs:drange datatype:DecimalNumber .
>>
>>the statement:
>>
>>    person:Jenny ex:age "Humpty Dumpty" .
>>
>>would always be false
>
>OK. But you don't care how it gets to be false, as it were.

that kind of inconsistency detection is indeed "beyond"
but it can be delegated to appropriate machinery
and it should be no problem to hand that over
as a check (with stringified object)
  _:xx datatype:DecimalNumber "Humpty Dumpty" .

--
Jos
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 19:25:01 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:19 EDT