W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Datatyping Summary V4

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 18:44:14 +0200
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B88486FE.D219%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

OK. I think I was able to get my head around that one...

Thanks ;-)

Patrick


On 2002-02-04 18:34, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> Patrick:
>> You seem to be doing some magic based on implicit
>> human knowledge about the relationship between
>> xsd:decimal and xsd:decimal-de (presuming there is
>> one).
> 
> 
> 
> Brian (I think):
>>>> 
>>>>    <foo>      <eg:size>   _:s1 .
>>>>    _:s1       <xsd:double-de>  "10,5" .
>>>> 
>>>>    <bar>      <eg:size>   _:s2 .
>>>>    _:s2       <xsd:double>  "10.5" .
>>>> 
> [entails (my text)]
>>>> 
>>>>    <foo> <eg:size> _:s .  [ jjc modified this ]
>>>>    <bar> <eg:size> _:s .
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> Under S-A, and as I understand it, in Pat's rework in progress of (similar
> examples in) TDL, the model theory has both bNodes interpreted as the actual
> value 10.5 (the number). Since values in the model are "tidy" (unlike
> lexical nodes in the graph) it is the case that the sizes are the same.
> 
> More formally in any model of the first two triples _:s1 will be interpreted
> as 10.5.
> In any model of the second two triples _:s2 will be interpreted as 10.5.
> Hence in any model of the first four triples, there is an interpretaion of
> _:s (which happens to be as 10.5) which makes the last two triples true.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 11:43:32 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:03 EDT