W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

RE: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4]

From: Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:36:30 -0800
Message-ID: <145C1D60907A4944ABAE75DE3FF6418C3B146E@xchanger3.interwoven.com>
To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly said
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote:
> > At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > >Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts
> > >of properties.
> > That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly.
> There's some lack of clarity somewhere; folks seem to be arguing:
> 	if communities need to use both datatyping idioms,
> 	they need double properties.
> 	PRISM needs datatyping
> 	=> therefore
> 	PRISM needs double properties
> which isn't a sound inference; it needs another premise:
> 	PRISM needs to use both datatyping idioms.
> I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps)
> will do just fine only using S-B.

Indeed. After considering this, I've concluded that the
'double property definition' problem is a complete non-issue
for PRISM. I don't presume to speak for any other group defining
a vocabulary, of course.

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 12:37:10 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:05 EDT