- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:08:02 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Pat Hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
[...] >>rdf:dlit >>rdf:dlex (to suggest the LEXical space of a Datatype) >>rdf:valueOf >>rdf:nameIs > >I suggest use of rdfs namespace, rather than rdf. > >My personal preference is for rdfs:lex (rdfs:dlex if this is more >consistent with other names), but I don't care strongly. sounds good, rdfs:dlex -- Jos ps there's too much in it, but just to give an idea of an entailment test case (containing other etc's and still using rdf:dlit) -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Feb/0022.html
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2002 06:08:43 UTC