W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: around the table on datatypes [ was: Re: datatyping draft 3 (for telecon)]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 18 Feb 2002 15:41:48 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1014068509.19333.85.camel@dirk>
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 13:34, Brian McBride wrote:
> At 23:58 14/02/2002 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
> >Latest version of the datatype summary document now available at
> >
> >http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/DatatypeSummary3.html
> >
> >incorporating ideas arising from discussions with Patrick S. (rdfs:drange 
> >and especially section 10).
> 
> I would like to "go round the table" of the WG on the latest datatype 
> proposal.  By go round the table, I mean to solicit the views of each 
> member of the WG, without initiating a debate on members views.  We can 
> then summarize those views and deal with issues arising.
> 
> Please answer the following questions:
> 
>    o Does the datatyping proposal meet your
>      needs and the needs of your users?
>      (Who are they?) (What is missing?)

No. Two things are missing:

(a) enough RDF/XML examples to get going in monkey-see-monkey-do fashion

(b) S-B, i.e. a way to use rdfs:range to restrict the range
of a property to the lexical space of some datatype.

I think these are straightforward additions; they're as much
about emphasis and documentation as technical specifics
(though using rdfs:range this way requires that the model
theory admit literals as subjects.)

>    o Are there features that could be dropped and
>      still meet the needs of your users? (Which?)

I could live without doublets (rdf:value/rdf:dtype).
I don't mind them being there, though.

>    o Does the proposal 'work for you'?

I think so.

I'm not sure I understand the question.


>    o Are there any concerns with the proposal
>      you would like to raise? (What are they?)
> 
> Brian
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 16:42:18 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:45:15 EDT