RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:dehora@eircom.net] 
>
> 
> Please, we all know this is humbug and that lang is an odd 
> man out; no-one's asking why the string is a part of literal. 
> It's simply that the syntax is tied too closely to the model 
> at this point in the M&S and the lang tag is an XML artefact 
> that's crept into the graph. 

I meant to say crept into the model. 

Bill de hÓra

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 08:36:32 UTC