Sunday, 30 June 2013
Thursday, 27 June 2013
Wednesday, 26 June 2013
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Registration for TPAC 2013 is Open
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
Tuesday, 25 June 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: [webcomponents] Minutes from 21 June 2013 f2f meeting
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- Re: Namespacing Components
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
Monday, 24 June 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
- Re: HTML imports and rendering
- Re: HTML imports and rendering
- Re: HTML imports and rendering
- Re: Namespacing Components
- Re: Namespacing Components
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- [webcomponents] Minutes from 21 June 2013 f2f meeting
- Re: HTML imports and rendering
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: HTML imports and rendering
- Re: HTML imports and rendering
Sunday, 23 June 2013
- HTML imports and rendering
- Re: Web Component Element definition
- Re: Web Component Element definition
- Re: Web Component Element definition
- Re: Web Component Element definition
- Re: Web Component Element definition
- Web Component Element definition
Thursday, 20 June 2013
Friday, 21 June 2013
- [gamepad] Re: spec status (redux)
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
Thursday, 20 June 2013
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- [Bug 21136] Define Home key and Back key of Android smartphone
- [Bug 21120] Define TV or A/V remote controller's keys
- [Bug 21121] Define mobile phone related keys
- [Bug 21137] Define key names for game controller of Android
- [Bug 21083] Proposal key names for Android
Tuesday, 18 June 2013
Monday, 17 June 2013
- Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
- [Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties
Sunday, 16 June 2013
Saturday, 15 June 2013
Friday, 14 June 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- [Bug 22370] Inform script of corruption-induced data loss
- [Bug 22370] New: Inform script of corruption-induced data loss
- [cssom-view] Adding elementsFromPoint() to Document
- Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
- Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- [file-api] What's left before LCWD?
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
Thursday, 13 June 2013
- RE: webappsec tests moved to GitHub
- CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of Indexed Database; deadline June 20
- Re: [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method
Wednesday, 12 June 2013
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- RE: Files on IndexedDB
- RE: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Proposal for a filesystem API
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- [Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
- [Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Considering an onincompleteload event
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
- CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
Monday, 10 June 2013
- Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
- Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
- Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
- Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
Sunday, 9 June 2013
Friday, 7 June 2013
- [Bug 21833] Under read* chaining during load event loadends should be suppressed
- Re: inputmode attribute
Thursday, 6 June 2013
- Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
- Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
- Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
- Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
- Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
- [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
Wednesday, 5 June 2013
- webappsec tests moved to GitHub
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
Monday, 3 June 2013
- [Bug 21725] Specify id for Step 1 of the Web Workers Processing Model
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
- Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
- Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- RE: [PUSH API] Scope of the specification
- Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
- [html-templates] Seeking pre-LC comments for HTML Templates; deadline June 10
- [PUSH API] Scope of the specification
- [shadow-dom] spec markup
- Re: [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
- inputmode attribute
Sunday, 2 June 2013
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Fwd: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Filesystem events
- Re: Filesystem events
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
Saturday, 1 June 2013
Friday, 31 May 2013
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
- Re: [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
- [Bug 22228] New: Clarification of timeout attribute late overrides
- [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
- Re: [File Api]: How to Test <input type="file"> ?
Thursday, 30 May 2013
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
- [File Api]: How to Test <input type="file"> ?
- Re: [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
- Re: [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
- RE: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
- RE: [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
- Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
- Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
- RE: [IndexedDB] Is the spec ready to start a CfC for Last Call Working Draft?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
- Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
- Files on IndexedDB
Wednesday, 29 May 2013
- RE: Filesystem events
- Re: Filesystem events
- RE: Filesystem events
- Re: Filesystem events
- [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
- RE: Filesystem events
- Re: Filesystem events
- W3C Launches Patent Advisory Group for Push API
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Filesystem events
- Re: Filesystem events
- Filesystem events
- Re: CfC: publish Widget Updates as a WG Note; deadline May 23
- [Bug 22196] New: Clarification of InputMethodContext behavior when an element losts focus.
- [Bug 22194] New: Clarificaiton of 'enabled' property behavior
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
- [Bug 21993] Change .getInputContext() to .inputMethodContext
Tuesday, 28 May 2013
- [editing] deletion and moving caret across stub and contenteditable=false elements (was: Re: [editing] nested contenteditable)
- [editing] nested contenteditable
- Re: [webcomponents]: First sketch of <element> element
- Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
- RE: [editing] nested contenteditable
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- RfC: 2nd Last Call of "Vibration API"; deadline June 13
Saturday, 25 May 2013
Thursday, 23 May 2013
- [Bug 19831] Investigate overrideMimeType()
- Re: Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
- Re: The JavaScript context of a custom element
- Face to Face on Shadow DOM and CSS interactions
- Re: CfC - working on manifest
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Fetch: please review!
- [Bug 16000] Trailers
- [Bug 22130] New: Modification for clear and delete method
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
- [webcomponents]: First sketch of <element> element
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: CfC: publish Widget Updates as a WG Note; deadline May 23
- Re: CfC - working on manifest
- Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
Monday, 20 May 2013
- Re: The JavaScript context of a custom element
- Re: The JavaScript context of a custom element
- The JavaScript context of a custom element
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
- Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- [Bug 22094] New: Add 'target' in InputMethodContext
- [Bug 22093] New: Consider adding candidatewindowshow/update/hide events and getCandidateWindowClientRect()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
- Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
Sunday, 19 May 2013
Friday, 17 May 2013
Saturday, 18 May 2013
- Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
Friday, 17 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- [Bug 19771] Need way to determine what keys are supported on device.
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
Thursday, 16 May 2013
- CfC: publish Widget Updates as a WG Note; deadline May 23
- RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 7
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- RE: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- RE: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- RE: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
- Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- RE: RE: [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
- [Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
- [Bug 22058] "error" event should fire before final readystatechange event
- Re: RE: [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
- [Bug 22059] New: Composition dictionary should be changed
- [Bug 22058] New: "error" event should fire before final readystatechange event
- [Bug 22057] New: Clarify InputMethodContext's scope in the spec
- RE: [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
- [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
- Re: [IndexedDB] Does "Abort this algorithm" mean "Abort transaction"?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Does "Abort this algorithm" mean "Abort transaction"?
- [IndexedDB] Does "Abort this algorithm" mean "Abort transaction"?
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
- Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- RE: CfC - working on manifest
- Re: CfC - working on manifest
- RE: CfC - working on manifest
- Re: CfC - working on manifest
- Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
- CfC - working on manifest
- CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
- Kickoff application manifest work
- Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- [Bug 22028] New: Consider adding hasComposition() in InputMethodContext
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
Monday, 13 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: Re: [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
- Re: Re: [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
- Re: [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
- [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
- [Bug 22018] New: Consider adding getCompositionAlternatives() in InputMethodContext
- A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
Friday, 10 May 2013
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: jar protocol
- CfC: publish new WD of Shadow DOM; deadline May 11
- Re: jar protocol
- [Bug 21993] New: Change .getInputContext() to .inputMethodContext
- [XHR.Bleeding-edge] ED update
- [Bug 21992] New: Consider adding getInputContext() to SVGElement
- Re: jar protocol
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
- Re: CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
- CfC: publish LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline May 16
- Re: jar protocol
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Is the spec ready to start a CfC for Last Call Working Draft?
- Re: CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
- [IndexedDB] Is the spec ready to start a CfC for Last Call Working Draft?
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- RE: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
- Re: [Gamepad] spec status
- Re: [Gamepad] spec status
- Re: Web SQL and SQL
- Re: Web SQL and SQL
- Web SQL and SQL
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
- [XHR] anonymous flag
- [D3E] Draft minutes from 7-May-2013 call [Was: Re: WebApps DOM3 Events Wiki page]
- WebApps DOM3 Events Wiki page
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- RE: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Change of affiliation
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
- Re: Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Manifest, Re: Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
- Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
- Re: Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- RE: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- RE: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
Monday, 6 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: Re: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- [Bug 21945] New: Does responseXML ever return an XMLDocument
- Re: Re: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- RE: [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
Sunday, 5 May 2013
- Re: [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
Saturday, 4 May 2013
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
Friday, 3 May 2013
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- [pointerlock] Re: ACTION-678: Ask Vincent about next step for PointerLock (e.g. what needs to be done to go LC)
- Re: ZIP archive API?
Thursday, 2 May 2013
- Re: [selectors-api] References to Selectors 4
- Re: [Gamepad] spec status
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- [Gamepad] spec status
- W3C Brand Survey
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- prollyfill registry [Was: Re: URL comparison]
- [Bug 21318] anon flag should be anonymous
- Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
- Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
Wednesday, 1 May 2013
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- RE: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
Tuesday, 30 April 2013
- [webcomponents]: Comprehensive update of Custom Elements spec
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- Re: ZIP archive API?
- ZIP archive API?
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- [selectors-api2] Seeking implementation data re Selectors API Level 2
- [quota-api] Seeking status and plans for Quota Mangement API
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
- Re: CfC: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
- Prefer Error than exception for DataCloneError and DataError
Monday, 29 April 2013
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- [Bug 21555] Use of IDL arrays for keyPath values is underdefined
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
- Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- Re: Multiple Decorators
- Re: Multiple Decorators
- Multiple Decorators
- Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
- RE: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
- [admin] WebApps' next f2f meeting is Nov 11-12 @ TPAC in Shenzhen China
Sunday, 28 April 2013
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: Draft minutes: 26 April 2013 f2f meeting
- Re: Draft minutes: 26 April 2013 f2f meeting
Saturday, 27 April 2013
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
- CfC: publish new WD of Introduction to Web Components; deadline May 4
- CfC: publish FPWD of HTML Imports; deadline May 4
- CfC: publish FPWD of Custom Elements; deadline May 4
- CfC: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
- CfC: publish Java bindings for WebIDL as a WG Note; deadline May 4
- Draft minutes: 26 April 2013 f2f meeting
Friday, 26 April 2013
- [Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order
- [Bug 21801] [IndexedDB] Cursor operations when source deleted are not defined
- [Bug 21836] Remove NotSupportedError on creating index for multiEntry index with array keyPath
- [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
- Draft minutes: 25 April 2013 f2f meeting
- Draft minutes: 25 April 2013 f2f meeting
- [Bug 21836] New: Remove NotSupportedError on creating index for multiEntry index with array keyPath
Thursday, 25 April 2013
- [Bug 21833] New: Under read* chaining during load event loadends should be suppressed
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
- Re: URL comparison
- RE: URL comparison
- Re: URL comparison
- Re: Why not be multiEntry and array keyPath togather?
- Proposal for a filesystem API
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Why not be multiEntry and array keyPath togather?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- URL comparison
- Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
- RE: [IME] Preparing some feedback
- [Bug 14364] appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
- Re: Feedback about W3C Input Method Editor API draft
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
- Re: [admin] Call for Agenda topics for April 25-26 f2f meeting
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
- [Bug 21801] New: [IndexedDB] Cursor operations when source deleted are not defined
- [PushAPI] New version of the Push API
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: Feedback about W3C Input Method Editor API draft
- Critic [was: Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names]
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Feedback about W3C Input Method Editor API draft
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
Monday, 22 April 2013
- RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
- InedxedDB events : misconception?
- Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities
- Re: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
- Re: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
- RE: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
- For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
- Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
Sunday, 21 April 2013
Saturday, 20 April 2013
Friday, 19 April 2013
- Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
- [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
- Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
Thursday, 18 April 2013
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
- Re: Futures and transactions
- Re: DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
- RfC: API portion of JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LCWD; deadline May 10
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
Wednesday, 17 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Update of the IME API spec working draft [call for comments]
- Re: DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
- Re: DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
- DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- [Bug 21725] New: Specify id for Step 1 of the Web Workers Processing Model
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Upload progress events and redirects
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Upload progress events and redirects
- Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
Monday, 15 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- [admin] Editors and Test Facilitators: please update your PubStatus data before April 25
- [Bug 18551] [IndexedDB] Ambiguity about operations preceding a failed createIndex.
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- [Bug 21649] Duplicate requirement
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Futures and transactions
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: Futures and transactions
- Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: Futures and transactions
Sunday, 14 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
Saturday, 13 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
Friday, 12 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
- [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
- Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
- Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
- RE: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
- [Bug 20045] data: URLs, HTTP, and parsing
- Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
- Re: [editing] Comments on WebKit addRange implementation
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
Thursday, 11 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Blocking custom elements on ES6, was: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Blocking custom elements on ES6, was: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- [webcomponents]: Blocking custom elements on ES6, was: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
- Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
- Re: What will be the query language for IndexedDb
- Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
- Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Class side inheritance in WebIDL (was Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax)
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- RE: What will be the query language for IndexedDb
- What will be the query language for IndexedDb
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Fwd: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- [Bug 21650] New: Require that XHR is available in workers
- [Bug 21649] New: Duplicate requirement
Tuesday, 9 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
- Re: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
- Re: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
- Re: Futures and transactions
Monday, 8 April 2013
- Re: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
- Futures and transactions
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: fixing appcache...
Sunday, 7 April 2013
Friday, 5 April 2013
- [editing] Comments on WebKit addRange implementation
- Re: Reviewing test submissions
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- RE: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- RE: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
- Re: Update of the IME API spec working draft [call for comments]
Thursday, 4 April 2013
- [Bug 21584] FileReader.error should be nullable
- [Bug 21585] New: Calling abort() when readyState != LOADING, Gecko throws an exception
- [Bug 21584] New: FileReader.error should be nullable
- Re: Reviewing test submissions
- Re: Reviewing test submissions
- Re: Reviewing test submissions
- Re: Reviewing test submissions
- Reviewing test submissions
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Move to GitHub: step 1 completed
- [selectors-api] References to Selectors 4
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
- RE: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
- RE: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
- Re: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- RE: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- Re: File API: Blob.type
- Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
- Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
- [Bug 21559] [IndexedDB] Term "primary key" needs defining
- [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
- Re: fixing appcache...
- Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
- [Bug 21559] New: [IndexedDB] Term "primary key" needs defining
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
- Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
- Re: [indexeddb] spec for keyPath attributes is underdefined
- [indexeddb] spec for keyPath attributes is underdefined
- [Bug 21555] New: Use of IDL arrays for keyPath values is underdefined