- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:36:52 -0400
- To: "Hironori Bono (坊野 博典)" <hbono@google.com>, Kenji Baheux <kenjibaheux@google.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <Mike@w3.org>, "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <kochi@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Mike, All, During WebApps' April 25 discussion about IME API ([Minutes]), Mike agreed to a couple of actions for the ime-api spec: * ACTION-690 - Ask the IME Editors to remove Canvas examples (e.g. images) [on Michael[tm] Smith - due 2013-05-02]. * ACTION-691 - Smith to take back PFWG feedback to the IME API editor (Kochi) and propose we excise the mentions of DOM-based editor use-case in the use-case document, and the specific mentions of <canvas> in the actual spec [on Michael[tm] Smith - due 2013-05-02]. It appears 690 has been addressed but I'm not entirely sure of 691. Regardless, please update Tracker accordingly <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/users/39522>. Also, did the group decide to not support a webpage creating their own IME, at least not for v1? Lastly, I would appreciate it, if the Editors would please update the latest ED [ED] so it has a proper ToC, References, and such. -Thanks, AB [Mins] <http://www.w3.org/2013/04/25-webapps-minutes.html#item12> [ED] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.html>
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 11:37:24 UTC