- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 14:45:15 +0500
- To: Hironori Bono (坊野 博典) <hbono@google.com>, "Kenji Baheux" <kenjibaheux@google.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <Mike@w3.org>, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) <kochi@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Fri, 31 May 2013 16:36:52 +0500, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
wrote:
> Hi Mike, All,
>
> During WebApps' April 25 discussion about IME API ([Mins]), Mike agreed
> to a couple of actions for the ime-api spec:
[...]
> Also, did the group decide to not support a webpage creating their own
> IME, at least not for v1?
No, we ran out of time and did not ahve a resolution either way. There
were some voices raised against allowing this, and others in favour.
Swapping my chair hat for my Yandex cap, we already do this in
high-profile sites and would like standards that made it work better.
cheers
Chaals
> [Mins] <http://www.w3.org/2013/04/25-webapps-minutes.html#item12>
> [ED] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.html>
>
>
>
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 12:46:02 UTC