- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 12:53:58 -0700
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
http://w3cmemes.tumblr.com/post/34633601085/grumpy-old-maciej-has-a-question-about-your-spec On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: > On the second thought: why not make imports dynamic, just like stylesheets? > > :DG< > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com> wrote: >>>> Just after started prototyping HTML Imports on Blink, this idea comes to my >>>> mind: Why not have <import> for HTML Imports? >>> >>> Because changing parsing for <head> is not done, basically. >>> >>> rel=import not being dynamic kinda sucks though. Maybe we should >>> consider using <meta>? It has a bunch of uses that are non-dynamic. >> >> I used <link> primarily because most of the <link rel="stylesheet"> >> plumbing seems to fit best with <link rel="import">. >> >> Interesting idea about <meta>... >> >> :DG< >
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 19:54:57 UTC