Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Daniel Buchner <daniel@mozilla.com> wrote:

> @Rick - when you say "see above", to what are you referring? IMO we arrive
> at our intended outcome without introducing <script> scoping or attribute
> issues, and at the same time reducing boilerplate, with the following:
>
>
> <element tagname="x-foo" inherits="SVGElement">
>   <template>...</template>
>   <script>
>       XFooElement.prototype.bar = function(){...}
>       XFooElement.prototype.readyCallback = function(){...}
>   </script></element>
> </element>
>
>  Where am I going wrong here?
>

DRY. Remember that we want to end up with ES6 class syntax so having to
specify inherits as an attribute and extends in the class syntax does not
seem good.

-- 
erik