- From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 19:02:36 +0000
- To: Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <sicking@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <409129e1474f4a2c82663758d4e4f0fd@BL2PR03MB228.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
I am on vacation this week and my time's pretty scarce documenting our next release. However, if people help me not miss important data, I can create (next week) and maintain a list similar to the one I did for LC1. Eliot From: Joshua Bell [mailto:jsbell@google.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:43 AM To: Arthur Barstow Cc: Eliot Graff; Jonas Sicking; public-webapps Subject: Re: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments Without volunteering (I'm slammed this week and next...) On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com<mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com>> wrote: Hi All, Since the May 16 LCWD of IDB [LC2] ends June 7, I am wondering who is going to process the LC comments. Here is the list of IDB e-mails and bugs I have logged since the LC was published: * Files on IndexedDB ; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0810.html ; 30-May-2013; piranna@gmail.com<mailto:piranna@gmail.com> ^^^ May merit a clarifying comment in the spec that blobs/files/filelist are stored by value (i.e. a copy of the bytes) rather than by reference. I didn't think the spec was ambiguous here but we can let the thread play out. * Bug 22130 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22130 ; Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method ; 21-May-2013 ; Kyaw Tun ^^^ A feature request, backwards compatible. No need to include in V1 spec. * IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError ; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0741.html ; 20-May-2013 ; Kyaw Tun <kyawtun@yathit.com<mailto:kyawtun@yathit.com>> ^^^ Essentially a feature request; doesn't match current implementations. Could consider for a future spec. * request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement ; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0738.html ; 17-May-2013 ; Ben Kelly <bkelly@mozilla.com<mailto:bkelly@mozilla.com>> ^^^ A feature request, backwards compatible. No need to include in V1 spec. * Inform script of corruption recovery ; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0742.html ; thread started 11-Feb-2013 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/0354.html ^^^ A feature proposal, backwards compatible. No need to include in V1 spec. Joshua, Eliot, Jonas - who is going to track LC#2 comments? (For reference, the comment tracking document for the first LC is [LC1-Comments] and the IDB feature list is [IDB-features].) -Thanks, AB [LC2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-IndexedDB-20130516/> [LC1-Comments] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/default/IndexedDB%20Disposition%20of%20Comments.html> [IDB-Features] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures>
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 19:06:06 UTC