- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 00:58:59 +0200
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
* Jonas Sicking wrote: >On May 4, 2013 1:29 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> > We also don't reuse keep-alive http connections. >> >> Are we talking about persistent connections as per >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-8.1 or the obsolete >> HTTP/1.0 feature? > >In the sense of the keep-alive header. I'm not sure, but I think it was >defined in HTTP 1.1. It's extremely unlikely that the `Keep-Alive` header is special here. It rather seems to me you meant "We also don't reuse http connections." A HTTP connection has to be persistent, has to be kept alive, in order for it to be re-used, and how or why a connection is "kept alive" does, most probably, not affect whether Firefox will re-use it in your sense above. And no, HTTP/1.1 as defined in RFC 2616 does not use the `Keep- Alive` header. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 4 May 2013 22:59:26 UTC