Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions

I was a little confused. I realized something I already knew in that elem.querySelector[All] does limit the matched set to the descendants of element, but the selector itself is not relative. Sorry about that. 

‚ÄčI guess my only question now is what is the difference between the way .find[All] and .querySelector[All] relate to the context object? Why the wording difference?

Thanks again, 

- Timmy

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Timmy <> wrote:

> The wording of the QSA and findAll definitions are a bit confusing to me. Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding, but the definitions for querySelector[All] and find[All] seem to be partly reversed.
> First, the definition of subtrees seems clear enough:
> "The term subtrees refers to the set of elements that are descendants of the specified context object."
> However, the definition for querySelector currently states: "return the first matching Element node within the subtrees of the context object". Isn't that the definition for find? Element#querySelector does not limit matching to subtrees of the context object. `elem.querySelector("div")` will return all divs on the page, not just descendants of `elem`. I assume this was not meant to be changed here.
> find states: "return the first matching Element node from the tree within which the context object is located". This sounds just like what querySelector is supposed to do. Element#querySelector returns results based off of the tree in which the element is located.
> Thanks,
> - Timmy

Received on Sunday, 9 June 2013 23:36:21 UTC