- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:00:05 +0100
- To: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
- Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com> wrote: > I argue on that issue that we should not bubble the event and have the > handler on document only. Pointer lock doesn't have as much legacy spec > churn as fullscreen, but I think we're in a position to have both of them be > cleaned up before un-prefixing. Okay. Lets kill the bubbling and define the event handlers inline. Sorry for the delay. Fullscreen still depends on HTML for <iframe allowfullscreen> and for HTML terminating fullscreen when navigating. Does pointer lock require something similar? -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 14:00:32 UTC