Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl from Brian Kardell on 2013-04-14 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2013)

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 21:13:50 -0400
To: Daniel Buchner <daniel@mozilla.com>
Cc: William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>, John J Barton <johnjbarton@johnjbarton.com>, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, Dave Herman <dherman@mozilla.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, Blake Kaplan <mrbkap@mozilla.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>
Message-ID: <CADC=+jdu8U2W2X8dY-XDESM2CaPUBKhqg8TgOUkxM0K6XbcFPw@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 13, 2013 8:57 PM, "Daniel Buchner" <daniel@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> @Rick - if we generated a constructor that was in scope when the script
was executed, there is no need for rebinding 'this'. I'd gladly ditch the
rebinding in favor of sane, default, generated constructors.

I think we need someone to summarize where we are at this point :)

Is anyone  besides scott in favor of the

2) Invent a new element specifically for the purpose of defining prototypes

For the record, i am not.

Received on Sunday, 14 April 2013 01:14:17 UTC