Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Vincent Scheib <> wrote:
> I argue on that issue that we should not bubble the event and have the
> handler on document only. Pointer lock doesn't have as much legacy spec
> churn as fullscreen, but I think we're in a position to have both of them be
> cleaned up before un-prefixing.

So how much can we still change fullscreen? It should really use futures.


Received on Thursday, 11 April 2013 17:23:30 UTC