- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:14:39 -0700
- To: Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen <hallvord@opera.com>
- Cc: Julian Aubourg <j@ubourg.net>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen <hallvord@opera.com> wrote: > TL;DR: I'm not aware of evidence that spec'ing this is required for compat, I do buy the argument that precision might cause better future compat, I'm however concerned about back compat and find it surprising that a strictly spec'ed implementation detail will sometimes transform the case the script actually used. Yeah, we might have to preserve casing of the encoding label if there's a (byte case-insensitive) match to begin with. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 18:15:10 UTC