- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:52:52 -0400
- To: Kyaw Tun <kyawtun@yathit.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
FYI, Kyaw replied to me privately with "Yes, I agree" re my question if the group's resolution for this bug was acceptable. Thanks Kyaw for review and timely response. -Regards, ArtB On 6/11/13 9:46 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi - your bug is considered a "Last Call comment" and it was included > in the LC's comment tracking document [1]. > > In [2], Joshua proposed this bug be addressed as "Resolved/Later" and > the bug has been closed as such. > > For the purposes of tracking your comment, please indicate if this > resolution is acceptable or not. > > -Thanks, ArtB > > [1] > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/default/Comments-16-May-2013-LCWD.html> > > [2] > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013AprJun/0817.html> > [3] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures> > > On 6/11/13 2:13 PM, ext bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22130 >> >> Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com> changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Status|NEW |RESOLVED >> CC| |jsbell@google.com >> Resolution|--- |LATER >> >> --- Comment #2 from Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com> --- >> Not for the "V1" spec, so marking RESOLVED / LATER >> > >
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 11:53:19 UTC