Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com> wrote:
>> Just after started prototyping HTML Imports on Blink, this idea comes to my
>> mind: Why not have <import> for HTML Imports?
>
> Because changing parsing for <head> is not done, basically.
>
> rel=import not being dynamic kinda sucks though. Maybe we should
> consider using <meta>? It has a bunch of uses that are non-dynamic.

I used <link> primarily because most of the <link rel="stylesheet">
plumbing seems to fit best with <link rel="import">.

Interesting idea about <meta>...

:DG<

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 18:29:29 UTC