www-html@w3.org from May 1996 by subject
Starting: Wed 01 May 1996 - 00:00:-83910 EST
Ending: Fri 31 May 1996 - 00:00:-816 EST
Messages: 553
- "Journalism"
- "KEY SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB" DOCUMENTED IN SECOND ISSUE OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB JOURNAL
- (fwd)
- (no subject)
- (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair
- 3.2 tables and the width attribute
- <ALIGN=JUSTIFY>
- <H1 SRC="foo.gif">
- <hr> images
- <link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html">
- <math>, <fig>, ...
- <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)
- <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd))
- <math>, <fig>, ...)
- <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3,
- <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0
- <p align=indent>
- <style> and <!-- comments -->
- <style> and Wilbur
- Abut inline graphics -- how?
- Alpha testers wanted
- Alternate source tags?
- Archive with HTML 2.0 specs
- Bandwidth
- Bandwidth (fwd)
- browser functions and HTML
- bullets and lines
- Call for Speakers
- CDROM.COM & FixPack names?
- Color Palette Spec?
- Color Palette Spec? -Reply
- Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ]
- CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal....
- CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... -Reply
- CTP's UL, OL, LI proposal.....
- Deprecating FONT and CENTER
- Descending Ordered Lists
- Digressions (was: Footnotes)
- directory identifiers
- Disappointed by Wilbur....
- DIV/CLASS
- DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments]
- DUH! (was:prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>)
- Exclusions of blocks from <DIR> or <MENU>
- excuse
- Existing practice
- FIG and OBJECT
- Fixed page layout
- Font-style vs. phrase elements
- Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd)
- Font-style...
- For the future - requests for the W3C
- For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd)
- For the future...
- Form Content Models [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ]
- Futility of public forum
- HTML 3.0
- HTML 3.0 -Reply
- HTML 3.2
- HTML 3.2 -Reply
- HTML 3.2 (fwd)
- HTML 3.2 -Reply
- HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ]
- HTML 3.2 and Frames
- HTML 3.2 Content Models
- HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting
- HTML 3.2: BASE element
- HTML 3.2: Bug in OL, LI attribute definition lists
- HTML 3.2: HEAD content model
- HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply
- HTML 3.2: PRE, IMG, and tabbing
- HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA)
- HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing
- HTML 3.xx & scalability
- HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ]
- HTML Plans [was: I am confused]
- HTML3.2
- HTML3.2 and the standards process
- HTML3.2 DTD 15May96 comment
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt
- ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply)
- IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text...
- images as bullets in <UL>
- IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ]
- IMG in PRE?
- IMG in PRE? -Reply
- IMG TAG
- Inline code a mistake?
- Inline macros
- Internationalization
- Lexical details of HTML [was: DIV/CLASS ]
- Lost Eudora email
- MATH
- Math-mode in HTML
- MENU Content Model [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ]
- META
- Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility
- More on list attributes, <HR>
- More on Lists...
- Move the "neurons" talk, please
- Moving on...
- Multipage Forms
- My vote
- My vote (fwd)
- Need a new DTD for style sheets
- New HTML 3.2 specification
- New Tag Proposal
- Non-browser uses of HTML
- OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan
- OFF-TOPIC - experiment TERMINATED!
- Opening multiple frames
- Palettes and bad rendering
- Plaintext and depreciated elements
- Practical Joke
- Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI>
- Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply
- Proposal: New Anchor attributes
- prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>
- Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ]
- Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd)
- Question
- QUESTION: <resource>, how would it work?
- Re an earlier post about Expert Systems Protoype
- removeme
- Scripts, attributes and CRLF
- Spacing
- Spacing (was IMG in PRE?)
- SRC and DINGBATS
- Status of HTML 3.2 [was: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) ]
- Style sheets not in HTML 3.2
- summary of proposed revisions
- summary of proposed revisions (fwd)
- Tables
- Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD
- Tables draft advances to RFC
- tables in AOL browser
- Take note Dan
- Te <OBJECT> draft; was, FIG and OBJECT
- text on graphics?
- text on graphics?)
- Underlining, (was: HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB
- Unique Names & content scope
- Unique Names & content scope -Reply
- URNs (Was: New Anchor attributes)
- Web neurons
- WebNet-96 Final CFP (San Francisco)
- Welcome to www-html!
- what *I* would do with Wilbur.
- What's wrong with
- What's wrong with <FONT>
- What's wrong with <FONT>?
- What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org!
- What's wrong with <FONT>?)
- Why a DTD for HTML 3.2?
- Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd)
- Wilbur
- www-html-d Digest V96 #60
- www-html-d Digest V96 #61
- www-html-d Digest V96 #89
- zorba
Last message date: Fri 31 May 1996 - 00:00:-816 EST
Archived on: Fri Feb 20 1998 - 13:27:37 EST
This archive was generated by DEISS/hypermail.