Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd)

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@beach.w3.org)
Thu, 23 May 1996 12:28:15 -0400


Message-Id: <m0uMdFH-0002UnC@beach.w3.org>
To: marcush@crc.ricoh.com (Marcus E. Hennecke)
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 May 1996 15:22:57 MST."
             <199605222222.PAA00659@cougar.crc.ricoh.com> 
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 12:28:15 -0400
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>

In message <199605222222.PAA00659@cougar.crc.ricoh.com>, Marcus E. Hennecke wri
tes:
>
>Very interesting! This is to become the next step after Wilbur, right?

Those are some rough ideas about future specs, yes.

It should come as no surprise, relative to the Activity statement
that's been there all along:

	http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Activity

>How is the work progressing on this? It seems to include the latest
>table draft and the I18N work as well as object. Also, some of the
>suggested list attributes can be found. CLASS, ID, and STYLE seem to
>be in there as well and I see that <P ALIGN=JUSTIFY> works again. How
>definite is all of this?

Not definite at all. It's just some stuff I hacked together. It
hasn't been reviewed by anybody, really.

Dan