Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply

Daniel W. Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Thu, 30 May 1996 23:34:30 -0400


Message-Id: <199605310334.XAA05578@anansi.w3.org>
To: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 May 1996 14:16:14 PST."
             <s1adadd1.026@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil> 
Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 23:34:30 -0400
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>

In message <s1adadd1.026@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>, Charles Peyton Taylor writes:
>
>>>> Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com> 05/28/96 09:32pm >>>
>>This reminds me... sometime last year, there was talk about
>>W3C-branding, where there would be some kind of logo -- sort of
>>like Adobe's true
>>PostScript logo (the page curling up from a computer screen) or
>>Underwriter's Laboratories' (UL) logo. Seems to me that customer
>>demand could be created for such an accreditation, and perhaps
>>"the Wilbur concession" could be used as a steppingstone towards
>>that...
>>Dan, did anything ever come of the logo talk?

A few things:

* we have a logo (or at least the address of a logo)

http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur/html32.gif

Please don't make copies: just link to it, in case we
want to change it. Let's give caching a chance, shall we?

* We'll be running our own validation service RSN. I hope
to compliment the other services out there. This one will
not be end-user focused, so much as developer focused:
it will allow folks to submit test cases, etc.

* Conformance testing is still in the "gathering resources"
phase. Stay tuned to:
	http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-test/

Dan