Message-Id: <m0uNPH6-0002UdC@beach.w3.org> To: Lee Daniel Crocker <email@example.com> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 May 1996 22:25:47 MST." <199605240525.WAA21345@web2.calweb.com> Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 15:45:19 -0400 From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <email@example.com> In message <199605240525.WAA21345@web2.calweb.com>, "Lee Daniel Crocker" writes :, Lee Daniel Crocker writes: >Can we take all the brainstorming and speculation about >this neural net stuff elsewhere? HTML may well be an >interesting way to implement what you want to do, but >the idea isn't nearly that well formed yet. In case folks are wondering, I don't share this sentiment. As long as an idea is novel and the participants are civil, I don't care how half-baked an idea is when it's discussed on this list. I'll take this over "where do I find a 1-pixel gif?" any day. Dan p.s. I wouldn't mind seeing the discussion moved to www-talk, because I agree with the folks who think this idea deserves its own data format. By the way: how come everything is discussed on www-html? It seems like www-html is 10x more well-known. I wonder why that is?