- From: James K. Tauber <jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 17:34:20 +0800
- To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Daniel W. Connolly wrote: > It could be called "HTML 3.2 Structured" > > > >Would anybody be interested? > > Yes: especially with respect to interoperability among HTML > authoring tools. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If authoring tools are DTD-driven there's no problem. If they aren't, well, I'd be willing to guess that the majority of those tools don't conform to any DTD let alone the existing HTML 3.2 draft. -- James K. Tauber / jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au University CWIS Coordination Officer The University of Western Australia
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 1996 05:31:23 UTC