Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements

James K. Tauber (jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au)
Wed, 22 May 1996 17:34:20 +0800


Message-Id: <31A2DF9C.77BB@library.uwa.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 17:34:20 +0800
From: "James K. Tauber" <jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au>
To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements 

Daniel W. Connolly wrote:
> It could be called "HTML 3.2 Structured"
> >
> >Would anybody be interested?
> 
> Yes: especially with respect to interoperability among HTML
> authoring tools.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If authoring tools are 
DTD-driven there's no problem. If they aren't, well, I'd be willing to 
guess that the majority of those tools don't conform to any DTD let 
alone the existing HTML 3.2 draft.


-- 
James K. Tauber / jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au
University CWIS Coordination Officer
The University of Western Australia