Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements
James K. Tauber (jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au)
Wed, 22 May 1996 17:34:20 +0800
Message-Id: <31A2DF9C.77BB@library.uwa.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 17:34:20 +0800
From: "James K. Tauber" <jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au>
To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@beach.w3.org>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements
Daniel W. Connolly wrote:
> It could be called "HTML 3.2 Structured"
> >
> >Would anybody be interested?
>
> Yes: especially with respect to interoperability among HTML
> authoring tools.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If authoring tools are
DTD-driven there's no problem. If they aren't, well, I'd be willing to
guess that the majority of those tools don't conform to any DTD let
alone the existing HTML 3.2 draft.
--
James K. Tauber / jtauber@library.uwa.edu.au
University CWIS Coordination Officer
The University of Western Australia