Message-Id: <199605032215.PAA25716@web1.calweb.com> Subject: Palettes and bad rendering To: email@example.com Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 15:15:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lee Daniel Crocker" <firstname.lastname@example.org> The issue is that the original poster ran into what he preceived as a problem, and suggested a possible (though granted, very bad) solution. Arguing about how bad it is or whether we should shuffle it over to HTTP or CSS isn't focusing on the problem in the first place. Let's step back a minute: The problem, as I see it: When one designs a presentation with many spot colors, and it is displayed by most browsers running on palette-based displays, it looks like crap, even if the display in question is as capable as that on which it was designed. As I see it, then, the issue is not one of lack of information-- sending more information, therefore, won't help. The issue is that browsers are getting the information and doing a lousy job displaying it. Each image already contains complete information about how it wants to be displayed. The page itself contains complete information on how it wants to be displayed. Browsers just aren't listening. Complain to Netscape, not www-html. A different, but related, issue, is how to display a presentation on a machine less capable than that on which it was designed. To me, that just seems like the same old resource variant problem, and so should be solved with existing methods, i.e. HTTP content negotiation and nested <object> declarations. Doing this will require some additional information to standardize the format of, so we could reasonably talk about that. How about something like: <object type="image/x-png; bitdepth=24" href="true-color.png"> <object type="image/x-png; bitdepth=8" href="256-color.png"> <img href="16-color.gif"> </object> </object> and similarly for Accept: headers in HTTP? Some indication of monochrome vs. color might be useful as well. I don't think we can sweep this under a rug by telling everyone to get true color or go away; 8-bit displays will always be less expensive than true-color because less RAM. And monochrome will always be less than color, so those displays will always be around. There's no reason we should allow a designer to optimize for all cases if he wants to. It's even less acceptable to tell designers to "design to the medium" by ignoring those who want full color and sound if they've got it. Advertising dollars speak louder than pontifications on purity any day.