Re: HTML 3.2

Mike Meyer (mwm@contessa.phone.net)
Wed, 8 May 1996 10:36:55 PST


Subject:  Re: HTML 3.2
In-Reply-To: <199605081613.LAA28752@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
From: mwm@contessa.phone.net (Mike Meyer)
Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 10:36:55 PST
Message-Id: <19960508.7601480.9FFB@contessa.phone.net>
To: www-html@w3.org

> I think it's obvious - it preempts the presumption that 3.0 is "more
> valid" than this version.  Too many people still expected that 3.0 was
> where the standard was going.  Since there's no way to "erase" 3.0,
> using a higher number makes it clearer that 3.2, rather than 3.0, is
> the thing to look at.

"The future isn't what it used to be."

	<mike