IMG in PRE? from Keith Instone on 1996-05-12 (www-html@w3.org from May 1996)

From: Keith Instone <instone@cs.bgsu.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 13:57:34 -0400
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <199605121757.NAA10826@bullwinkle.cs.bgsu.edu>

With HTML 3.2 being ironed out, is it time to allow IMG in PRE?
I read the discussion on www-html from back in January on this topic
and still do not see a good reason to exclude IMG from within PRE.
Dan Connolly admits it might have just been an oversight a long
time ago. Lots of people have found good uses for IMG in PRE. Why
not make it officially valid?


Keith

Received on Sunday, 12 May 1996 13:57:15 UTC