Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd)

MegaZone (
Fri, 10 May 1996 19:15:00 -0700 (PDT)

Message-Id: <>
Subject: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd)
Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 19:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: MegaZone <>

Once upon a time Daniel W. Connolly shaped the electrons to say...
>About FIG and Math: they are not dead. Math has a whole working group
>to itself. Considerable resources are spent on it every week. FIG is
>still very much in consideration, though not in exactly the form it
>took in the March 95 HTML 3.0 draft.

I did see your example of what FIG could do that OBJECT couldn't - but
doesn't it make more sense to simply expand object to encompass everything
FIG does sice it already does some of it?  And then we don't have to have
two tags that overlap and duplicate efforts, instead we can have one tag
that is extensible and flexible.

Although I work for Livingston Enterprises Technical Support, I alone am
responsible for everything contained herein.  So don't waste my managers'
time bitching to them if you don't like something I've said.  Flame me.
Phone: 800-458-9966  <> 
FAX: 510-426-8951    6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566