Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)

Brian Behlendorf (brian@organic.com)
Tue, 21 May 1996 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)


Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
To: Fisher Mark <FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com>
Cc: Dave Carter <dxc@ast.cam.ac.uk>, "'MegaZone'" <megazone@livingston.com>,
Subject: Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <31989194@MSMAIL.INDY.TCE.COM>
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960521114730.19927L-100000@fully.organic.com>


Am I a pariah for thinking that the functionality which <math> hopes 
to encompass would be much better suited to a different data type 
altogether, embedded in HTML using <object> rather than trying to 
squeeze it into HTML proper?  Separating it out makes implementation 10x 
easier (just distribute plug-ins), makes evolution independent from HTML, 
and gives authors a number of ways to represent their data (i.e., I might 
have the Mathematica data type, the postscript version, and a GIF 
version, and content-negotiate between them).

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  |  We're hiring!  http://www.organic.com/Home/Info/Jobs/