www-html@w3.org from May 1996 by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other archives: [ this mailing list ][ other W3C mailing lists ]

• (no subject) Sat, 4 May 1996 09:16:50
• Abigail
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 13:37:49 +0200
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Tue, 28 May 1996 03:38:28 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Tue, 28 May 1996 02:02:44 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 15:55:54 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 03:55:57 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... Sat, 18 May 1996 08:18:51 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: <ALIGN=JUSTIFY> Fri, 17 May 1996 19:22:43 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: images as bullets in <UL> Fri, 17 May 1996 01:23:28 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 20:01:03 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 17:48:32 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Wed, 15 May 1996 02:45:38 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Wed, 15 May 1996 02:15:34 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: For the future - requests for the W3C Tue, 14 May 1996 03:16:29 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Mon, 13 May 1996 23:58:23 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Sat, 11 May 1996 18:02:06 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: MATH Sat, 11 May 1996 17:54:39 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: text on graphics? Sat, 11 May 1996 05:09:25 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: text on graphics? Fri, 10 May 1996 23:43:58 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 14:59:58 +0200 (MET DST)
• Albert Lunde
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Fri, 31 May 1996 00:53:45 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ] Thu, 16 May 1996 12:30:58 -0500
• andreas@wni.co.jp
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Wed, 15 May 1996 10:19:51 +0900
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? Mon, 13 May 1996 13:38:24 +0900
  • HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 9 May 1996 17:05:44 +0900
  • Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames Thu, 9 May 1996 17:05:30 +0900
• Angel Diaz
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 17:16:58 -0400
• Anita Sundaram
  • Re an earlier post about Expert Systems Protoype Mon, 6 May 1996 10:47:30 -0700
• Arnoud
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 24 May 1996 20:15:49 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.2: BASE element Wed, 22 May 1996 20:20:28 +0200
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Tue, 21 May 1996 19:35:38 +0200
  • Re: IMG TAG Sat, 18 May 1996 20:46:02 +0200
  • Re: images as bullets in <UL> Fri, 17 May 1996 22:25:02 +0200
  • Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply Fri, 17 May 1996 22:29:33 +0200
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 1996 17:27:24 +0200
• Aron S. Spencer
  • Descending Ordered Lists Thu, 16 May 1996 17:52:35 -0400
• Art Pollard
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Wed, 29 May 1996 22:42:45 -1000
• Assoc Advancement Computers Education
  • WebNet-96 Final CFP (San Francisco) Thu, 23 May 96 16:58:41 EDT
• BearHeart / Bill Weinman
  • Re: text on graphics? Sat, 11 May 1996 12:29:04 -0500
  • New Tag Proposal Wed, 08 May 1996 15:07:11 -0500
  • Re: Practical Joke Wed, 08 May 1996 11:18:02 -0500
• Ben Combee
  • Exclusions of blocks from <DIR> or <MENU> Fri, 10 May 1996 14:13:01 -0500 (CDT)
• Benjamin C. W. Sittler
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 14 May 1996 21:11:10 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Sat, 11 May 1996 14:13:22 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: Moving on... Wed, 8 May 1996 11:17:51 -0600 (MDT)
• Benjamin Franz
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 18:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 08:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Mon, 20 May 1996 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 1996 13:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Mon, 13 May 1996 14:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 06:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Bj|rn-Helge Mevik
  • Re: MATH Mon, 13 May 1996 10:08:20 GMT
  • Re: MATH Mon, 13 May 1996 08:52:23 GMT
• Boleslaw Mynarski
  • Re: CDROM.COM & FixPack names? Wed, 01 May 96 10:58:21
  • Opening multiple frames Wed, 01 May 96 10:38:11
• Brendan Seaton
  • Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0 Mon, 13 May 1996 22:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
• Brent Eades
  • QUESTION: <resource>, how would it work? Fri, 31 May 1996 08:53:02 +0000
• Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 14:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
• C. Len Bullard
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Wed, 29 May 1996 15:13:05 -0500 (CDT)
• Carl Johan Berglund
  • URNs (Was: New Anchor attributes) Tue, 28 May 1996 09:58:26 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Tue, 28 May 1996 09:21:38 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Fri, 24 May 1996 14:02:37 +0200
• cdreagan@indyunix.iupui.edu
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Thu, 2 May 1996 14:53:55 -0500 (EST)
• Charles Peyton Taylor
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply Fri, 31 May 1996 09:14:08 -0800
  • Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Thu, 30 May 1996 14:16:14 -0800
  • Need a new DTD for style sheets Thu, 30 May 1996 12:26:56 -0800
  • Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Tue, 28 May 1996 09:36:36 -0800
  • Underlining, (was: HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Mon, 27 May 1996 15:44:03 -0800
  • DUH! (was:prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>) Tue, 21 May 1996 17:39:27 -0800
  • prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link> Tue, 21 May 1996 17:29:04 -0800
  • Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... -Reply Tue, 21 May 1996 10:48:14 -0800
  • ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply) Fri, 17 May 1996 16:09:30 -0800
  • <style> and <!-- comments --> Fri, 17 May 1996 11:25:28 -0800
  • <style> and Wilbur Fri, 17 May 1996 11:18:52 -0800
  • Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply Fri, 17 May 1996 10:15:00 -0800
  • images as bullets in <UL> Thu, 16 May 1996 14:20:43 -0800
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Wed, 15 May 1996 09:29:18 -0800
  • <menu>, Style sheets ; was:Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Tue, 14 May 1996 15:21:16 -0800
  • Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Tue, 14 May 1996 09:26:52 -0800
  • IMG in PRE? -Reply Mon, 13 May 1996 11:13:35 -0800
  • Plaintext and depreciated elements Fri, 10 May 1996 10:27:01 -0800
  • 3.2 tables and the width attribute Fri, 10 May 1996 10:17:51 -0800
  • what *I* would do with Wilbur. Thu, 09 May 1996 12:09:29 -0800
  • Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Thu, 09 May 1996 11:26:51 -0800
  • bullets and lines Wed, 08 May 1996 15:51:32 -0800
  • META Wed, 08 May 1996 14:52:04 -0800
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 07 May 1996 14:39:35 -0800
  • Unique Names & content scope -Reply Sun, 05 May 1996 18:32:18 -0800
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? -Reply Fri, 03 May 1996 14:17:19 -0800
• Chris Josephes
  • Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI proposal..... Thu, 23 May 1996 00:01:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • More on Lists... Sun, 19 May 1996 22:19:56 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... Fri, 17 May 1996 23:36:16 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: images as bullets in <UL> Thu, 16 May 1996 22:05:42 -0500 (CDT)
  • SRC and DINGBATS Mon, 13 May 1996 23:15:08 -0500 (CDT)
  • FIG and OBJECT Fri, 10 May 1996 22:29:20 -0500 (CDT)
  • Disappointed by Wilbur.... Tue, 7 May 1996 23:56:16 -0500 (CDT)
• Chris Spurgeon
  • Re: Abut inline graphics -- how? Tue, 7 May 1996 14:47:49 -0400 (EDT)
• Chris Wilson
  • Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 15:33:45 -0700
  • Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 09:58:14 -0700
• Christopher Russell
  • Abut inline graphics -- how? Tue, 7 May 1996 11:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
• Chuck Norris
  • Re: Palettes and bad rendering Fri, 3 May 1996 16:05:03 -0700
• Colin P. A. Kennedy
  • Re: Web neurons Tue, 21 May 1996 21:06:33 -0500
  • Re: IMG TAG Sat, 18 May 1996 09:38:54 -0500
  • IMG TAG Sat, 18 May 1996 09:07:18 -0500 (CDT)
• Craig Tinsley
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Thu, 23 May 1996 15:47:06 -0700
• Dan Delaney
  • IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... Thu, 9 May 1996 10:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 11:07:18 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 09:24:09 -0400 (EDT)
  • Color Palette Spec? Thu, 2 May 1996 11:18:43 -0400 (EDT)
• Daniel W. Connolly
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Thu, 30 May 1996 23:51:38 -0400
  • Re: Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD Thu, 30 May 1996 23:36:38 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Thu, 30 May 1996 23:34:30 -0400
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Tue, 28 May 1996 23:46:47 -0400
  • HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Tue, 28 May 1996 23:09:52 -0400
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Tue, 28 May 1996 23:15:58 -0400
  • Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please Sat, 25 May 1996 15:45:19 -0400
  • Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Thu, 23 May 1996 12:28:15 -0400
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Thu, 23 May 1996 07:44:37 -0400
  • Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 16:07:54 -0400
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 15:56:54 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Wed, 22 May 1996 15:50:04 -0400
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Wed, 22 May 1996 08:10:20 -0400
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Tue, 21 May 1996 11:55:38 -0400
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Tue, 21 May 1996 10:38:25 -0400
  • Re: DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments] Thu, 16 May 1996 17:26:21 -0400
  • IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ] Thu, 16 May 1996 13:03:19 -0400
  • Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ] Thu, 16 May 1996 12:26:02 -0400
  • Lexical details of HTML [was: DIV/CLASS ] Thu, 16 May 1996 12:15:56 -0400
  • Re: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] Mon, 13 May 1996 09:44:04 -0400
  • HTML Plans [was: I am confused] Fri, 10 May 1996 15:17:49 -0400
  • MENU Content Model [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ] Fri, 10 May 1996 12:46:51 -0400
  • Re: Form Content Models [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ] Fri, 10 May 1996 12:38:42 -0400
  • Status of HTML 3.2 [was: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) ] Fri, 10 May 1996 12:02:34 -0400
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 09:54:06 -0400
  • Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] Fri, 10 May 1996 09:41:52 -0400
  • Re: HTML3.2 and the standards process Thu, 09 May 1996 19:38:40 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 08 May 1996 12:05:02 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 08 May 1996 11:08:01 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 07 May 1996 23:53:10 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 07 May 1996 23:32:01 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 07 May 1996 16:33:46 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 07 May 1996 15:03:08 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 07 May 1996 10:30:46 -0400
  • HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Mon, 06 May 1996 19:28:06 -0400
  • "KEY SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB" DOCUMENTED IN SECOND ISSUE OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB JOURNAL Wed, 01 May 1996 14:59:43 -0400
  • Re: Alternate source tags? Wed, 01 May 1996 00:59:17 -0400
  • Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Wed, 01 May 1996 00:41:19 -0400
• Dave Carter
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 10:06:09 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 09:59:44 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: summary of proposed revisions Wed, 22 May 1996 09:45:47 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 14 May 1996 12:18:03 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Mon, 13 May 1996 09:46:20 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 12:30:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 11:44:07 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 11:35:04 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Fri, 10 May 1996 09:46:39 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 10:00:34 +0100 (BST)
  • HTML 3.0 Wed, 8 May 1996 09:59:15 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 7 May 1996 16:48:18 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 7 May 1996 16:23:56 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 15:42:50 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Thu, 2 May 1996 16:45:46 +0100 (BST)
• Dave Hollander
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 31 May 1996 08:49:21 -0600
• Dave Raggett
  • Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Tue, 21 May 1996 17:16:12 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2: BASE element Tue, 21 May 1996 16:49:10 -0400
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 09:33:16 -0400
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 1996 17:44:00 -0400
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 17:48:28 -0400
• David Ornstein
  • Alpha testers wanted Mon, 20 May 1996 09:52:47 -0700
• David Peilow
  • Multipage Forms Fri, 31 May 1996 14:20:46 GMT
• Davide Musella
  • Re: META Thu, 9 May 1996 15:05:46 -0100 (GMT)
• DBERLIN
  • Re: (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair Thu, 9 May 1996 11:22:54 -0400
• Dianne Gorman
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Sat, 11 May 1996 02:08:30 +1000
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Thu, 9 May 1996 08:08:33 +1000
  • HTML 3.2 Content Models Thu, 9 May 1996 03:50:47 +1000
• Domingo Siliceo
  • Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Sun, 12 May 1996 20:40:21 +0100
• Drazen Kacar
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 19:59:41 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 15:49:15 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Wed, 15 May 1996 02:38:44 +0200 (MET DST)
  • IMG in PRE? -Reply Mon, 13 May 1996 20:52:58 +0200 (MET DST)
• Edward Welbourne
  • Math-mode in HTML Thu, 23 May 1996 17:06:56 +0100 (BST)
• erik
  • zorba Wed, 15 May 1996 12:56:15 -0400
  • Re: Inline code a mistake? Mon, 06 May 1996 11:29:50 -0400
  • Re: Inline macros Mon, 06 May 1996 11:14:44 -0400
• Fil Mackay
  • Re: Web neurons Fri, 24 May 1996 13:13:44 +-1000
  • Re: Web neurons Tue, 21 May 1996 13:55:18 +-1000
• Fisher Mark
  • Re: IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ] Thu, 16 May 96 13:57:00 PDT
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Thu, 16 May 96 10:30:00 PDT
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) Thu, 16 May 96 10:12:00 PDT
  • Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 96 08:48:00 PDT
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 14 May 96 06:58:00 PDT
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 14 May 96 06:37:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 96 06:21:00 PDT
  • Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Tue, 14 May 96 06:24:00 PDT
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! Fri, 10 May 96 16:03:00 PDT
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 96 15:52:00 PDT
  • Re: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] Fri, 10 May 96 15:48:00 PDT
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 96 15:42:00 PDT
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 96 15:42:00 PDT
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 96 15:35:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML3.2 Fri, 10 May 96 15:08:00 PDT
  • Re: Non-browser uses of HTML Fri, 10 May 96 14:41:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 14:45:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 14:39:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 14:15:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 14:17:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 14:03:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 13:55:00 PDT
  • Re: Non-browser uses of HTML Thu, 09 May 96 13:53:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 96 13:43:00 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 08 May 96 09:14:00 PDT
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 03 May 96 08:33:00 PDT
• Foteos Macrides
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Thu, 23 May 1996 14:06:52 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 20:24:40 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 18:41:28 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> Fri, 17 May 1996 15:27:06 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Tue, 14 May 1996 14:51:09 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Take note Dan Mon, 13 May 1996 20:21:57 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: HTML3.2 Fri, 10 May 1996 16:38:16 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 10:11:49 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: HTML3.2 Thu, 09 May 1996 16:35:02 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: HTML3.2 Thu, 09 May 1996 11:30:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... Thu, 09 May 1996 11:26:48 -0500 (EST)
• Francois Stragier
  • Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Wed, 1 May 1996 16:52:37 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Wed, 1 May 1996 16:13:04 +0200 (MET DST)
• Gerald Oskoboiny
  • Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Fri, 31 May 1996 16:13:40 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 15:59:41 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 15:56:33 -0600 (MDT)
  • HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Thu, 30 May 1996 21:55:50 -0600 (MDT)
  • HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Thu, 30 May 1996 21:28:41 -0600 (MDT)
  • Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Mon, 13 May 1996 13:31:32 -0600 (MDT)
• Greg Fuller - GFULLER.US.ORACLE.COM
  • removeme 13 May 96 11:05:38 -0700
• Greg Kostello
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 16:17:21 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 16 May 1996 14:28:59 -0700
• Gregory J. Woodhouse
  • Re: Bandwidth Fri, 10 May 1996 11:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 10:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Inline code a mistake? Mon, 6 May 1996 08:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
• Hakon Lie
  • Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... Sat, 18 May 1996 15:03:42 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Sat, 18 May 1996 14:30:26 +0200
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Sat, 18 May 1996 13:51:22 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Tue, 14 May 1996 10:16:23 +0200
• Harold A. Driscoll
  • Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 14:09:57 +0000
  • HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Tue, 21 May 1996 17:08:23 +0000
  • HTML 3.2: BASE element Tue, 21 May 1996 16:52:03 +0000
• Ian S. Graham
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Wed, 29 May 96 14:20:29 EDT
• Ingo Macherius
  • Re: Moving on... Wed, 8 May 1996 20:22:37 +0200 (MDT)
  • Re: Existing practice Wed, 8 May 1996 21:01:57 +0200 (MDT)
• Internet-Drafts@cnri.reston.va.us
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt Wed, 29 May 96 09:20:17 -0400
• James K. Tauber
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Wed, 22 May 1996 17:34:20 +0800
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 17:26:47 +0800
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 10:02:29 +0800
  • Wilbur Wed, 08 May 1996 17:23:15 +0800
• James Tauber
  • Re: Deprecating FONT and CENTER Sat, 1 Jun 1996 11:45:18 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Sat, 1 Jun 1996 11:26:29 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Tue, 21 May 1996 23:02:10 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: Font-style... Tue, 21 May 1996 22:42:05 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 11:49:30 +0800 (WST)
  • Re: Moving on... Wed, 8 May 1996 22:26:53 +0800 (WST)
• Jim Taylor
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Thu, 16 May 1996 19:31:04 -0800
• Joe English
  • Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Fri, 31 May 1996 17:18:51 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Fri, 31 May 1996 11:34:31 PDT
  • Re: Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD Thu, 30 May 1996 16:11:53 PDT
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Tue, 28 May 1996 21:35:31 PDT
  • HTML 3.2: HEAD content model Thu, 16 May 1996 15:07:20 PDT
  • HTML 3.2: Bug in OL, LI attribute definition lists Thu, 16 May 1996 15:01:49 PDT
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Tue, 14 May 1996 19:51:07 PDT
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 15:53:41 PDT
  • Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 11:45:02 PDT
  • Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Sun, 12 May 1996 12:10:17 PDT
  • Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Fri, 10 May 1996 11:03:36 PDT
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Fri, 10 May 1996 10:37:00 PDT
• John Middlemas
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Fri, 31 May 1996 03:24:27 +0100
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Thu, 30 May 1996 03:50:15 +0100
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Wed, 29 May 1996 10:34:03 +0100
  • Re: Web neurons Sun, 26 May 1996 22:53:53 +0100
  • Re: Web neurons Fri, 24 May 1996 01:09:03 +0100
  • Re: Web neurons Thu, 23 May 1996 16:50:01 +0100
  • Re: Web neurons Thu, 23 May 1996 13:21:53 +0100
  • Web neurons Tue, 21 May 1996 04:10:24 +0100
• Jonas Liljegren
  • Re: <H1 src="foo.gif"> Sun, 12 May 1996 22:18:05 -0400
  • <H1 src="foo.gif"> Sun, 12 May 1996 22:07:50 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 09 May 1996 04:35:23 -0400
• Jonsm@aol.com
  • Fixed page layout Sat, 18 May 1996 17:15:23 -0400
  • Scripts, attributes and CRLF Sat, 18 May 1996 00:14:35 -0400
• Kay Martha Quittan
  • excuse Sun, 26 May 1996 12:13:58 +0200
• Keith Instone
  • IMG in PRE? Sun, 12 May 1996 13:57:34 -0400
• Kevin J. Dyer
  • (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair Thu, 9 May 1996 10:56:37 -0400
• Lee Daniel Crocker
  • Re: Need a new DTD for style sheets Thu, 30 May 1996 13:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
  • Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility Fri, 24 May 1996 22:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
  • Move the "neurons" talk, please Thu, 23 May 1996 22:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Font-style... Tue, 21 May 1996 10:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Wed, 15 May 1996 14:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Tue, 14 May 1996 16:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
  • Existing practice Wed, 8 May 1996 10:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • Non-browser uses of HTML Wed, 8 May 1996 10:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • Futility of public forum Wed, 8 May 1996 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames Wed, 8 May 1996 09:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • Internationalization Tue, 7 May 1996 09:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
  • Palettes and bad rendering Fri, 3 May 1996 15:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
• Len Bullard
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Tue, 28 May 1996 23:58:37 -0500
  • Re: Web neurons Mon, 27 May 1996 10:26:57 -0500
• levitte@lp.se
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 19:26:08 MET-1MET DST
• Lineaer Algebraiker
  • Re: My vote Thu, 16 May 1996 16:28:49 +0200
  • Re: MATH Mon, 13 May 1996 11:42:13 +0200
  • Re: MATH Sun, 12 May 1996 13:42:28 +0200
  • MATH Sat, 11 May 1996 15:10:47 +0200
  • Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...) Sat, 11 May 1996 11:39:52 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Wed, 08 May 1996 11:33:38 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Wed, 08 May 1996 11:16:17 +0200
  • Unique Names & content scope Sun, 05 May 1996 16:42:20 +0200
  • <link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html"> Wed, 01 May 1996 16:19:19 +0200
• Marc Girod
  • <p align=indent> Fri, 31 May 1996 10:35:10 +0300
• Marc Salomon
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 24 May 1996 08:46:57 -0700
  • Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 21:15:28 -0700
  • Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? Tue, 21 May 1996 16:00:48 -0700
• Marcus E. Hennecke
  • Deprecating FONT and CENTER Fri, 31 May 1996 11:50:52 -0700
  • Tables draft advances to RFC Thu, 30 May 1996 14:26:39 -0700
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 24 May 1996 13:27:29 -0700
  • Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 15:22:57 -0700
  • Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply Fri, 17 May 1996 10:23:48 -0700
  • Re: images as bullets in <UL> Thu, 16 May 1996 14:34:19 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 09:57:56 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 09:52:40 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 1996 16:04:23 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 1996 13:32:06 -0700
  • Re: text on graphics? Fri, 10 May 1996 18:00:04 -0700
  • Re: text on graphics? Fri, 10 May 1996 14:54:21 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 9 May 1996 12:30:31 -0700
  • Re: Non-browser uses of HTML Thu, 9 May 1996 12:26:10 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 12:08:22 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 9 May 1996 10:37:25 -0700
• Martin Gleeson
  • Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD Fri, 31 May 1996 08:00:18 +1000
• Mary Holstege
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Wed, 15 May 1996 16:39:24 -0700
• Matthew James Marnell
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Mon, 27 May 1996 19:14:23 -0400
  • Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Thu, 16 May 1996 11:37:02 -0400
  • Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Thu, 16 May 1996 11:37:46 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 07 May 1996 17:40:39 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 07 May 1996 15:58:06 -0400
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 03 May 1996 13:27:00 -0400
• Maurizio Codogno
  • Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 14:57:33 +0200
  • Re: For the future... Tue, 14 May 1996 14:52:02 +0200
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Sat, 11 May 1996 14:11:06 +0200
• MegaZone
  • Re: <p align=indent> Fri, 31 May 1996 06:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Wed, 29 May 1996 04:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: summary of proposed revisions (fwd) Thu, 23 May 1996 14:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 19:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
  • Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 17:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 17:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) Thu, 16 May 1996 13:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
  • My vote (fwd) Wed, 15 May 1996 17:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) Wed, 15 May 1996 16:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Tue, 14 May 1996 12:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Mon, 13 May 1996 19:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
  • For the future - requests for the W3C Mon, 13 May 1996 15:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
  • Take note Dan Mon, 13 May 1996 14:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 19:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Bandwidth (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 19:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
  • Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 19:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 18:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 04:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 03:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 03:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 03:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 03:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 02:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Fri, 10 May 1996 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Thu, 9 May 1996 18:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 00:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Abut inline graphics -- how? Tue, 7 May 1996 11:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
• Melt van Schoor
  • text on graphics? Fri, 10 May 96 22:02 GMT+0200
  • Re: Welcome to www-html! Thu, 9 May 96 06:29 GMT+0200
• Michael Seaton
  • Re: IMG TAG Sat, 18 May 1996 09:56:05 -0400
  • Re: Inline macros Tue, 7 May 1996 00:06:30 +0000
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 16:38:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Thu, 2 May 1996 16:28:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: <link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html"> Wed, 1 May 1996 16:33:35 -0400 (EDT)
• Michal Young
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE, IMG, and tabbing Fri, 31 May 1996 15:04:10 -0500
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 15:54:53 -0500
• Mike Altimore
  • Re: directory identifiers Wed, 15 May 1996 20:53:34 +0000
  • directory identifiers Wed, 15 May 1996 16:55:54 -0600 (CST)
• Mike Culver
  • Call for Speakers Fri, 10 May 1996 07:24:15 -0700
• Mike Meyer
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Wed, 15 May 1996 17:25:47 PST
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Wed, 15 May 1996 15:51:36 PST
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 15 May 1996 13:24:10 PST
  • Re: Re: Tue, 14 May 1996 22:36:37 PST
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT> Mon, 13 May 1996 07:54:31 PST
  • Re: <H1 SRC="foo.gif"> Sun, 12 May 1996 16:03:32 PST
  • Re: What's wrong with Sat, 11 May 1996 20:43:31 PST
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Fri, 10 May 1996 22:08:32 PST
  • (no subject) Fri, 10 May 1996 12:40:17 PST
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 10:36:55 PST
  • Re: HTML 3.0 Wed, 8 May 1996 08:36:40 PST
  • Re: Palettes and bad rendering Fri, 3 May 1996 15:45:23 PST
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 12:28:12 PST
• Mike Wexler
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 16:17:28 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 08 May 1996 08:27:26 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Tue, 07 May 1996 15:10:17 -0700
• Modibo Samake
  • HTML 3.2 and Frames Wed, 08 May 1996 11:52:58 -0400
• Murray Altheim
  • Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Wed, 22 May 1996 16:46:19 -0500
  • Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Tue, 21 May 1996 16:59:35 -0500
  • DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments] Thu, 16 May 1996 14:58:50 -0500
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Thu, 16 May 1996 08:04:34 -0500
  • Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Sat, 11 May 1996 15:13:04 -0500
  • Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Fri, 10 May 1996 15:15:28 -0500
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Wed, 8 May 1996 15:47:25 -0500
  • Re: Palettes and bad rendering Sat, 4 May 1996 12:53:22 -0500
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #60 Wed, 1 May 1996 18:49:57 -0500
  • Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Wed, 1 May 1996 10:32:54 -0500
• Nil E. Alexandrov
  • Question Fri, 10 May 96 00:07:48 +0400
• Nina Lewis
  • Re: OFF-TOPIC - experiment TERMINATED! 09 May 96 13:35:22 -0700
• Oliver Christ
  • Re: Archive with HTML 2.0 specs Wed, 8 May 1996 10:08:00 +0200
• OnSiteCPU@aol.com
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #60 Wed, 1 May 1996 17:59:24 -0400
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #61 Wed, 1 May 1996 17:59:21 -0400
• Paul Derbyshire
  • Practical Joke 8 May 1996 03:32:52 GMT
  • Re: Opening multiple frames 2 May 1996 01:37:14 GMT
• Paul Fidler
  • Re: PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification Mon, 13 May 1996 18:17:21 +0100 (BST)
• Paul Jones
  • Re: ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply) Fri, 17 May 1996 21:56:41 -0500 (CDT)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 09:43:13 -0500 (CDT)
• Paul Prescod
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 07:08:23 -0400
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Fri, 10 May 1996 06:15:20 -0400
  • Re: what *I* would do with Wilbur. Thu, 9 May 1996 18:54:22 -0400
  • HTML3.2 and the standards process Thu, 9 May 1996 17:16:19 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 15:28:00 -0400
  • Re: HTML3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 13:33:56 -0400
  • Re: IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... Thu, 9 May 1996 11:41:54 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 09:37:53 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 14:01:14 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 12:56:08 -0400
  • Re: Moving on... Wed, 8 May 1996 12:06:51 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 11:43:59 -0400
  • Moving on... Wed, 8 May 1996 09:28:20 -0400
  • "Journalism" Wed, 8 May 1996 04:17:58 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 7 May 1996 19:20:53 -0400
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 7 May 1996 12:21:41 -0400
  • Re: Inline code a mistake? Mon, 6 May 1996 12:04:58 -0400
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 10:00:23 -0400
• Paul Treadaway
  • Re: Math-mode in HTML Sat, 25 May 1996 00:55:03 +0100 (BST)
• Priscilla Johnson
  • Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #89 Wed, 15 May 96 09:22:14 PDT
• Ray Davis
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Wed, 29 May 1996 12:55:09 +0200
  • Re: Welcome to www-html! Thu, 9 May 1996 15:23:27 +0200
  • Welcome to www-html! Tue, 7 May 1996 17:48:21 +0200
• Robert S. Thau
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Tue, 21 May 1996 19:22:16 -0400
• Ron Newman
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Mon, 27 May 1996 22:05:36 -0500
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Mon, 20 May 1996 12:52:59 -0500
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Mon, 20 May 1996 12:53:03 -0500
• Ron Schnell
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 24 May 96 13:41:39 PST
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 24 May 96 10:33:43 PST
  • Proposal: New Anchor attributes Thu, 23 May 96 17:57:47 PST
• S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk
  • HTML3.2 DTD 15May96 comment Fri, 17 May 1996 11:28:45 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? Sun, 12 May 1996 14:21:24 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 14:39:27 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 17:29:36 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 14:56:52 +0100 (BST)
• schwarte
  • <math>, <fig>, ... Thu, 09 May 1996 22:45:36 -0100
• schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de
  • I am confused (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)) Fri, 10 May 1996 20:33:14 -0100
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 14:45:37 -0100
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Fri, 10 May 1996 11:28:14 -0100
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Fri, 10 May 1996 11:17:31 -0100
• Scott E. Preece
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Fri, 31 May 1996 17:02:08 -0500
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Thu, 30 May 1996 08:02:10 -0500
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Wed, 29 May 1996 09:15:52 -0500
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Wed, 29 May 1996 09:01:43 -0500
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Fri, 24 May 1996 08:44:47 -0500
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Wed, 22 May 1996 08:15:29 -0500
  • Re: Font-style... Tue, 21 May 1996 10:01:34 -0500
  • Re: OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan Tue, 14 May 1996 09:53:44 -0500
  • Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Tue, 14 May 1996 08:37:57 -0500
  • Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Mon, 13 May 1996 14:22:40 -0500
  • Re: What's wrong with Sun, 12 May 1996 23:16:40 -0500
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? Sat, 11 May 1996 22:20:33 -0500
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! Fri, 10 May 1996 11:00:46 -0500
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 09:17:48 -0500
  • Re: what *I* would do with Wilbur. Thu, 9 May 1996 16:57:57 -0500
  • Re: Non-browser uses of HTML Thu, 9 May 1996 14:59:47 -0500
  • Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Thu, 9 May 1996 14:51:32 -0500
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 9 May 1996 14:21:11 -0500
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 12:31:47 -0500
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Wed, 8 May 1996 11:13:57 -0500
  • Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Wed, 1 May 1996 10:16:52 -0500
• Shawn Steele
  • Re: <ALIGN=JUSTIFY> Fri, 17 May 1996 09:49:51 -0600
  • Re: <hr> images Wed, 15 May 1996 17:08:40 -0600
  • My vote Wed, 15 May 1996 17:03:44 -0600
  • Re: Bandwidth Fri, 10 May 1996 13:08:30 -0600
  • Bandwidth Fri, 10 May 1996 11:29:22 -0600
  • Re: Color Palette Spec? Fri, 3 May 1996 17:31:12 -0600
• Simon Cox
  • Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Sat, 25 May 1996 15:15:51 +0800
• Simon Greenberg
  • Color Palette Re: Color Palette Spec? Thu, 2 May 1996 22:36:25 +0300 (IDT)
• Srivastava Nandini
  • HTML 3.0 Fri, 24 May 1996 15:51:25 +0530 (IST)
• Stavros Macrakis
  • Re: Spacing Wed, 15 May 1996 15:22:19 -0400
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 17:04:09 -0400
  • Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 14:02:10 -0400
• Steve Heaney
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... 10 May 96 17:44:55 +0000
• Steven Ball
  • Re: Moving on... Thu, 09 May 1996 16:38:04 +1000
• Steven Clift
  • HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting Mon, 27 May 1996 04:26:42 -0500 (CDT)
• Stuart Harris
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
• T. Joseph W. Lazio
  • Re: Deprecating FONT and CENTER Fri, 31 May 1996 16:44:46 -0400
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 18:21:11 -0400
  • Indexing the Web (was Re: What's wrong with <FONT>?) Fri, 10 May 1996 14:05:02 -0400
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 08:44:21 -0400
• Thomas Reardon
  • Re: Fixed page layout Mon, 20 May 1996 14:14:40 -0700
• Thomas van Gulick
  • Re: Tables Mon, 20 May 1996 18:50:48 +0200
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 20:02:24 +0200
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 20:02:18 +0200
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 15:46:00 +0200
  • Tables Sat, 18 May 1996 23:36:19 +0200
• VidaesLoca@aol.com
  • Re: Call for Speakers Sat, 11 May 1996 14:10:09 -0400
• Walter Ian Kaye
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 15:55:53 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply Fri, 31 May 1996 14:35:06 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Fri, 31 May 1996 07:44:07 -0700
  • Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Thu, 30 May 1996 00:58:57 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Tue, 28 May 1996 22:32:07 -0700
  • Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please Sat, 25 May 1996 17:33:35 -0700
  • Re: Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility Sat, 25 May 1996 17:25:19 -0700
  • Re: Web neurons Thu, 23 May 1996 19:45:01 -0700
  • Lost Eudora email Tue, 21 May 1996 14:59:18 -0700
  • Re: Tables Sun, 19 May 1996 10:30:57 -0700
  • Re: Tables Sat, 18 May 1996 13:57:32 -0700
  • Re: IMG TAG Sat, 18 May 1996 10:41:50 -0700
  • Re: Descending Ordered Lists Fri, 17 May 1996 12:58:16 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 09:43:35 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 16 May 1996 07:52:39 -0700
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 18:05:10 -0700
  • Re: DIV/CLASS Tue, 14 May 1996 17:42:29 -0700
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 16:50:24 -0700
  • Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Tue, 14 May 1996 13:03:13 -0700
  • Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Tue, 14 May 1996 12:50:46 -0700
  • Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0 Tue, 14 May 1996 12:03:16 -0700
  • Re: For the future - requests for the W3C Mon, 13 May 1996 16:45:07 -0700
  • Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Sat, 11 May 1996 16:41:34 -0700
  • table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Sat, 11 May 1996 01:59:58 -0700
  • Re: text on graphics? Fri, 10 May 1996 18:50:30 -0700
  • Re: text on graphics? Fri, 10 May 1996 17:34:59 -0700
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fri, 10 May 1996 04:32:37 -0700
  • Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Fri, 10 May 1996 03:16:00 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Thu, 9 May 1996 19:09:01 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 9 May 1996 19:08:52 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 Thu, 9 May 1996 02:50:25 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Thu, 9 May 1996 02:40:38 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames Wed, 8 May 1996 10:57:47 -0700
  • Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Tue, 7 May 1996 09:50:17 -0700
  • Re: tables in AOL browser Mon, 6 May 1996 13:12:00 -0700
• Warren Steel
  • summary of proposed revisions Tue, 21 May 1996 11:51:00 -0500
  • Font-style... Tue, 21 May 1996 08:46:43 -0500
  • Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Mon, 20 May 1996 08:44:23 -0500
  • More on list attributes, <HR> Fri, 17 May 1996 16:47:18 -0500
  • Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> Fri, 17 May 1996 10:18:50 -0500
  • OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan Tue, 14 May 1996 09:05:12 -0500
  • Te <OBJECT> draft; was, FIG and OBJECT Mon, 13 May 1996 16:46:04 -0500
  • PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification Mon, 13 May 1996 11:41:02 -0500
  • browser functions and HTML Mon, 13 May 1996 11:41:00 -0500
  • Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? Fri, 10 May 1996 22:45:24 -0500
  • What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! Fri, 10 May 1996 09:40:09 -0500

Last message date: Fri 31 May 1996 - 00:00:-816 EST
Archived on: Fri Feb 20 1998 - 13:27:37 EST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other archives: [ this mailing list ][ other W3C mailing lists ]